Showing posts with label Casitas Water. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Casitas Water. Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2026

Perils of Imported Water



Letters: March 2026

RE: ‘Flowing Into the Future’

Your article highlights the ways local water districts are connecting together in the name of “resiliency.” On the surface this might make sense, but reading between the lines reveals the harsh reality for the Ventura River watershed, which has historically been securely independent of imported water.

Casitas Municipal Water District’s connection to Carpinteria will theoretically “allow water from the California State Water Project (SWP), constructed in the 1960s and 1970s, to flow from Santa Barbara County to Ventura County for the first time ever.” And on the other side of town, the city of Ventura’s connection to Callegus MWD also provides a connection from Lake Casitas to the State Water Project.

Calleguas MWD is honest when they say, “The Colorado River has been in an epochal drought” due to ever less snowpack in the headwaters. Climate change is also affecting the State Water Project, which relies on the dwindling Sierra snowpack. Not to mention subsidence in the Central Valley and the risk of ground-shifting earthquakes, these mega-systems are highly vulnerable and becoming less reliable.

Who really thinks it’s a good idea to tie into these failing systems? Our neighbors in Los Angeles County have seen the writing on the wall, and are investing heavily on capturing stormwater and enhancing their groundwater storage.

The SWP is heavily over-allocated, so this “paper water” merely provides cover for increased demand and new development, with no regard for the local sustainability of our existing communities.

So when the State Water Project fails to deliver for our neighbors in Thousand Oaks or Carpinteria, who will they turn to? Lake Casitas and all the water diligently saved by our conservation-minded community. 

- Paul Jenkin


Background:

The Ventura River Watershed Management Plan – watershed’s first comprehensive management plan – was approved by the Watershed Council on March 5, 2015.  At that time, and as a result of many collaborative meetings with all agencies present in the room, the consensus was that the resiliency of the watershed depended upon wise water management and independence from imported water.  This became the fundamental goal of the watershed plan:





References:

Ventura River Watershed Management Plan, Ventura River Watershed Council, March 5, 2015


In the news:

Flowing Into the Future: Water districts across Ventura County are planning for long-term use and drought resilience, Ventura County Reporter, Alex Wilson Mar 5, 2026

Letters: March 2026, Ventura County Reporter

The Colorado River is on the brink of possible forced water cuts. One thing is certain: There will be lawyers.

‘Snow-eater’ heat wave behind big Sierra melt is a look at our climate future


On this blog:


Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Robles Diversion and Matilija Dam


Robles Diversion has been an essential component of the Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project (MDERP) since planning began in 2000.  

Background:

The Robles Diversion and Fish Passage Facility is located on the Ventura River 2.3 miles downstream of the Matilija Dam. The Facility includes a timber diversion dam and control gates to divert flows from the upper Ventura River for storage in Lake Casitas.  The lake serves as a primary and backup water supply for agricultural and municipal water users served by the Casitas Municipal Water District (CMWD).  

The diversion was originally constructed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation in 1956 as part of the Ventura River Project which is built around Casitas Dam and Reservoir, located on Coyote Creek about two miles above its junction with the Ventura River.  Casitas infrastructure also includes the 5.4-mile Robles-Casitas Canal, which conveys the diverted flow of the Ventura River into Lake Casitas; and the main conveyance system, which includes 34 miles of pipeline, five pumping stations, and six balancing reservoirs located throughout the project area.  When originally constructed Lake Casitas had a capacity of 254,000 acre-feet, but recent estimates have reduced this to approximately 237,000 acre-feet. 

Robles Diversion and canal
Jan 2003, Rich Reid

According to CMWD, Lake Casitas fills primarily from the natural flow of local creeks and the Robles Diversion. In any given year roughly 1/3 of the Lake’s water comes from the Robles Diversion. 
Diversions are limited by the size of the canal, which can only convey 500 cubic feet per second (cfs) and regulations in a NOAA biological opinion that require adequate releases of water to ensure fish passage and other downstream water supplies. 

The Coyote Creek watershed area that drains directly into the lake is only 3,500 acres. (In comparison, the similar sized Lake Cachuma (193,304 acre-feet) in the neighboring Santa Ynez watershed is supplied by more than 70 times the watershed area of 417 square miles (266,880 acres).)   It was this small watershed area that necessitated the addition of diversion from the Ventura River to help maintain the water supply in Lake Casitas. 

In 2005, a fish passage facility was constructed to allow migration upstream and downstream as well as to screen smolt and other small fish from being diverted into the lake. The components of this facility are shown below:

Robles Diversion components
source: Casitas Municipal Water District


Sedimentation Problems:

Robles Diversion - the flood filled the forebay with sediment and breached the timber cutoff wall
Casitas Municipal Water District quickly implemented emergency repairs to restore water
 diversions to Lake Casitas

As the Robles Diversion dam captures water for diversion in the large forebay, it also traps sediment.  This sedimentation requires ongoing maintenance, including the costly mechanical removal and transport of sediment following a series of small storms or, in some cases, one big winter.

In January 2023 the upper Ventura River experienced a 50-year flood with flows over 20,000 cfs in the Robles reach.  This occurred following the Thomas Fire of December 2017 which burned the majority of the upper watershed.  A huge volume of sediment, including cobble and boulders, backed up behind the diversion dam filling the forebay.  Flows became diverted to the east, eroding the earthen berm up until, fortunately, the timber wall failed.   A similar event occurred in 1969, when 100-year flood flows were diverted both east and west (a phenomenon known as "avulsion") damaging both the diversion canal and the adjacent "riverbottom" neighborhood of Meiners Oaks.  Diversion capability was not restored for the remainder of 1969.

As described in Matilija Dam: removal plans and sediment transport, this existing sedimentation problem will become worse as sand, gravel, and cobble begin to pass over the dam.  Even if Matilija Dam remained in place, future equilibrium sediment loads will triple from what Robles has experienced over the past 70 years.  And dam removal will create a short term sediment "wave" that could also overwhelm the facility.

Solutions to increased sedimentation:

The 2004 Army Corps of Engineers feasibility study for dam removal included a "High Flow Sediment Bypass" at Robles Diversion.  This bypass consisted of additional gates that could be opened to allow sediment transported during peak flows to be flushed through this reach of the river, preventing the kind of backup that occurred in 2023.  
 
In 2019, the Robles Working Group was formed to aid planning and implementation of modifications to the Robles Diversion Facility (operational and/or physical) as an essential component of the Matilija Dam Ecosystem Restoration Project (MDERP).  A consulting team is facilitating and providing technical support for the RWG. The RWG is currently focused on evaluating and selecting an alternative for the Robles Diversion Facility that will enable it to function reliably for water supply, sediment passage, and fish passage.

This work has determined that 
• Existing bypass is too narrow, less than 30% of natural river channel
• Matching natural river width at Robles would require additional bypass between 130 ft to 160 ft wide. 
• It’s feasible to increase flow and sediment transport capacity at Robles
• Possible to adjust flow split between existing bypass and additional bypass as desired
by modifying invert elevation and forebay layout
• Various options to locate additional bypass and change approach flow conditions by
modifying forebay (narrowing, straightening, splitting)

Several alternatives were considered and narrowed down based on additional computer analysis.  Currently the Bureau of Reclamation has built a physical scale model in their facility in Denver to test various configurations and determine the best approach for optimum sediment management.

The two primary alternatives #3 and #5 are illustrated below:






Fisheries considerations:

Although the initial intent of the Robles Diversion modification effort was to address the sedimentation concerns experienced during high flows, the resource agencies have a strong interest in improving fish passage around the diversion facility.  Currently the fish ladder is the only opportunity for passage, even during times when the diversion is not operating.  All river flows are currently routed through the diversion facility down the fish ladder with no bypass option, even outside the diversion season.  And although the fish ladder has proven to be effective for trout, there is interest in ensuring other native species can pass.  Additionally, the current operations are governed by NOAA's biological opinion, which defines how much water is allocated to the fish passage operations.  All of this adds considerable complexity to an already difficult engineering task.   Considerable resources are being directed to the exploration of additional fish ramps or other passage facilities to resolve these concerns.

Flooding concerns:

The original Corps of Engineers plan for this reach included construction of a new levee extending downstream from the Robles Diversion.  This was based on coarse 1-dimensional flood modeling that predicted an incremental increase in streambed elevation due to dam removal.  




Apart from the huge construction footprint, local residents did not welcome the prospect of a large wall complete with chain link fences, rodent control, and service road in their back yards.  It turns out much of the flood concern was based on unrealistic backflow from the Ventura River.


Subsequent 2D modeling provided a more realistic understanding of the flood concerns at Meiners Oaks.  As described above, sediment trapped by the Robles diversion dam creates a flood hazard to the adjacent community when the river is diverted by the blockage (avulsion.)  The consulting team has conducted a preliminary study of how these high flow bypass designs will affect the downstream flood risk.  Although the existing flood risk from the Ventura River may be characterized as relatively minor overtopping of the naturalized embankment, initial assessment shows that enhancing the flow path through this reach will help reduce this potential flooding.  (Note that a considerable area of this neighborhood is at risk from overflow from Cozy Del creek, shown in yellow.)  These preliminary results are promising, although the primary flood risk is potential stream bank erosion on the left (east) bank of the existing high flow channel downstream of the Robles Diversion.  This downstream reach is directly affected by how flows are directed by the upstream modifications. 




Summary:

The Ventura River Project constructed in 1959 provided Casitas Municipal Water District more than the 50 year lifespan of benefits from Matilija Dam.  Over that period, the district was able to release water stored in Matilija reservoir for diversion at Robles into Lake Casitas.  Sedimentation has rendered Matilija Dam completely useless for water supply, and structural degradation requires its timely removal.  Most importantly, dam removal necessitates modernization of downstream infrastructure. 

Modification of the Robles Diversion facility has been identified as the critical path component of the Matilija Dam project.  Although complex and expensive, careful consideration of a solution that eliminates costly maintenance and periodic cleanout of sediment from the diversion facility as well as the need for costly maintenance of a permanent levee downstream will provide long term benefits to the community.  Completing this component will clear the path to dam removal which is necessary to restore watershed resilience including access to headwater habitat that the endangered steelhead require.  



References:




Monday, August 24, 2020

Casitas Draft Comprehensive Water Resources Plan


Comments on DRAFT CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES PLAN (CWRP 2020), Submitted by Surfrider Foundation, 8/24/2020

Casitas Municipal Water District is developing a Comprehensive Water Resources Plan (CWRP) to provide information to guide future management of our water supply. The draft document currently recommends almost $160 million in capital projects, most of which is dedicated to the pursuit of imported water from the State Water Project. The fiscal impact to the ratepayer is left for future work. However, although it is not highlighted in the document, the CWRP clearly demonstrates the community’s ongoing response to changing conditions, and the very real capacity for sustaining our local water supply without the cost of imported water.


Updated Models:

The Draft CWRP document contains valuable information on water demand and supply for the largest water district in the Ojai Valley. The updated Lake Casitas Yield Model estimates that the safe yield from Lake Casitas has been reduced by 15% since the 2004 model. This is primarily a result of lake sedimentation, changes to the Robles Diversion, and the impacts of a changing climate. SAFE YIELD is defined as the largest amount of water that can be drawn from Lake Casitas every year in the period of record, without storage dropping below the minimum allowable storage level.

However, the good news is that the actual demand for water has declined to match the changing conditions. Reduced demand is to some degree a result of the policies developed in the Water Efficiency and Allocation Program (WEAP, 2019), which reduce customer allocations according to the lake storage. Incorporating this demand reduction into the Lake Casitas Yield Model results in the more realistic concept of “Safe Demand.”

Safe Demand is the largest amount of water that can be drawn from Lake Casitas every year in the period of record when demand is reduced based on Lake level according to the WEAP policy. - CWMP

The updated Lake Casitas Yield Model now accounts for the demonstrated reductions in water consumption during drought periods. When accounting for climate change, the projected “Safe Demand” of 10,700 AFY on Lake Casitas is approximately half of the assumed Safe Yield, yet this is well within the range of current water use. In fact, according to the CMWD website, current lake demand is 7,381 AFY, reflecting more than 30% conservation of Safe Demand as recommended by the WEAP during stage 3 drought. Therefore, according to the updated modeling presented in the draft CWMP, the community is well on the path to sustainable use of Lake Casitas.



Risk Assessment:

Rather than build upon this favorable conservation trend, the CWRP inflates the projected demand on Lake Casitas in a risk assessment designed to demonstrate the need for significant investment in “new” water supplies.

The report acknowledges that;

Casitas water demand in the past five years has been considerably lower than 17,500 AFY, reflecting the willingness of Casitas customers to modify water use practices in response to the drought.

But for the purpose of analyzing future scenarios;

Casitas staff felt it was reasonable to assume a permanent savings of 10% from the 2016 UWMP forecast. Thus, the effective Casitas UWMP demand estimate used in the CWRP analysis was 15,750 AFY.

It is important to note that current water use is estimated at 7,381 AFY (CMWD website, Aug 2020.) This is more than 3,000 AFY (30%) below the Safe Demand of 10,700 AFY, or a full 60% reduction from the 2016 UWMP projected demand.

The CWRP presents a Risk Analysis based upon a seemingly arbitrary demand of 13,000 AFY, with the assumption that no emergency measures would be taken. This is approximately 2,500 AF greater than Safe Demand. Not surprisingly, this analysis resulted in a long-term supply deficit, for which;

Modeling showed a supplemental supply of 2,500 AFY would adequately mitigate that risk if achieved within one to five years.

The report goes on to recommend a suite of projects totaling over $150M to secure the “missing” 2,500 AFY. The majority of this money is required for large infrastructure proposals to connect to the State Water Project. (Note that 2,500 AFY is less than half of annual evaporation losses from Lake Casitas.)

The table below provides a summary of the various Supply and Demand estimates:



Community Resilience:

Throughout the Ventura River watershed, the community has exceeded recommended reductions in water allocations. This includes customers of the other water districts who all share in the limited local supply. This dramatic reduction in water use is largely in response to the recent catastrophes, including the Thomas Fire and severe drought. The community has clearly demonstrated the ability for adaptation in a time of need. And as the CWRP recognizes, some of these changes have resulted in a permanent demand reduction through lawn replacement and other water saving measures.

CMWD recognizes the importance of working with the community it serves:

“The main mechanism to respond to water supply conditions is to rely on informed customers working in partnership with Casitas to limit water use to no more than the assigned water allocation and support the water use limitations with appropriate conservation penalties for water use in excess of the assigned, or adjusted, allocation.” - WEAP 2019

Yet at the same time, CMDW appears hesitant to fully develop this community partnership:

Customers have a limit to their tolerance for being asked to conserve. Casitas will need to gauge public perception on this topic when the WEAP is updated.” - CRWP 2020

In the meantime, the community has successfully accomplished the sustainable “Safe Demand” as determined by the updated Lake Casitas Yield Model by incorporating WEAP demand reductions in response to lake levels.



Demand Management:

Demand management is always more cost effective than infrastructure dependent new supply projects. And the Ventura River community is just getting started. Numerous local projects were identified in the Ventura River Watershed Plan, and several initiatives are currently underway to plan and implement decentralized solutions aimed at improving conditions in the watershed. Indeed, the watershed plan (which CMWD participated in) developed the consensus objective of maintaining independence from imported water based upon the numerous emerging initiatives identified in the report.

Sufficient local water supplies to allow continued independence from imported water and reliably support ecosystem and human (including urban and agricultural) needs in the watershed now and in the future, through wise water management. “ – Ventura River Watershed Management Plan 2015

However, the CWRP relegates Demand Management to the status of “conditional strategy,” only pursuing such local options if plans for the State Water Project connection do not come to fruition.

Additional Demand Management: Because the CWRP planning policies already include a 10% demand reduction compared to the most recent UWMP, the long-term supply gap was addressed through developing new water supply projects and additional demand management was recommended as a conditional strategy. It is recommended that Casitas develop a Water Conservation Plan to evaluate the potential savings and cost effectiveness of various conservation measures.



Cost Benefit Analysis:

As recommended in the CRWP, the potential savings and cost effectiveness of various conservation measures needs to be carefully examined and compared with the more expensive infrastructure projects. The community deserves a fair and unbiased accounting because it is they who will bear the cost of these decisions.

In 2011, a group from the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management at UCSB developed a watershed model and investigated the cost effectiveness of a suite of infrastructure and consumer- based projects. Aside from the effectiveness of “consumer-based” programs such as re-landscaping and greywater, their report, Sustainable Water Use in the Ventura River Watershed, determined that:

Raising water rates to reflect the true value of water within the Ventura River Watershed will help to avert even higher rate hikes in the future, which will occur if water purveyors are forced to purchase costly State Water to meet consumer demand. – Bren Study 2011

The Bren report concludes with;

Our final recommendations to watershed planners in the Ventura River Watershed are: 

(1) implement programs encouraging the increased installation of ocean friendly gardens and greywater systems in single-family homes,

(2) construct decentralized infiltration basins throughout the watershed, and

(3) increase CMWD and Meiners Oaks water rates to the state average.

Implementation of these strategies, coupled with responsible groundwater pumping, has the potential to increase water availability for human needs, improve ecosystem health, and improve water quality even in the face of climate change, land use change, and population growth.


Bren school project: Sustainable Water for the Ventura River Watershed

Alternatives developed:

Infrastructure Based Water Management Strategies

page4image339296000

Infiltration Basins

Pervious Streets

Scalping Plant

San Antonio Spreading Grounds

Consumer Based Water Management Strategies

Ocean Friendly Gardens

Greywater

Rate Increases to State Average

CMWD 33% Rate Increase



Pitfalls of the State Water Project:

Contrary to the advertised benefits, connecting to State Water potentially threatens to undermine the sustainability of the community that relies upon the Ventura River watershed. Full disclosure of the pitfalls of this strategy is required before the community becomes committed to higher rates for “paper water” that we may never receive.


Research continues to indicate that rising temperatures will result in changes in precipitation patterns, a significant decline in the Sierra snowpack, and early snow melt such that For the vast majority of potential future climate conditions, the State Water Project will have substantially more system shortages than what we’ve seen historically,” according to Dr. Geeta Persad, a senior climate scientist with the Climate and Energy Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The California Water Impact network (C-WIN), a Santa Barbara based organization, published a 2017 report that demonstrates the cost impacts and consequences for State Water Project (SWP) participation to date, utilizing the experience of Santa Barbara County Coastal Aqueduct Project as an example of the statewide problem that will be encountered if the Twin Tunnels comes to fruition. The 'Santa Barbara Report' exposes the underlying problem of "paper water;" C-WIN spent three years gathering ... information through Public Records Act requests and Freedom of Information Act requests and found that consumptive water rights claims are at least 5 1⁄2 times more than available supply.

In a legal challenge against the City of Ventura’s State Water Interconnect Project, C-WIN states that:

The Interconnection Project is a major step backward from the growing recognition that local dependence on state water is a problem, not a solution, for water reliability and the environment. ...State water is so oversubscribed that the courts have identified more than half of its allocation as unreliable “paper water”.

The cost of state water will cripple Ventura’s ability to explore and develop sustainable regional solutions. ...Once a district is dependent upon the state water system, they’re responsible for the costs of the maintenance and new infrastructure of the entire SWP conveyance system. Ratepayers have no direct input and no ability to opt out of these maintenance and infrastructural decisions. The stated Ventura pipeline project estimate of $50 million does not include the exorbitant additional costs and risks of state water.

The EIR for the Interconnection Project evaded assessing the major impacts of growth encouraged by the false perception of state water availability. When the SWP predictably fails to ensure reliable deliveries, demands on other depleted sources such as groundwater, the Ventura River and Lake Casitas will only increase when it is too late to plan for integrated improvements in local water resilience.

These and other concerns voiced by the community regarding the long-term cost vs actual benefits indicate that State Water should be relegated to a “Conditional Strategy,” only coming into play if the local watershed-based strategy is not effective.


Conclusion and Recommendations:

The Draft CWRP provides an updated look at water supply and demand within the Casitas Municipal Water District service area. The new Safe Demand Policy provides a realistic assessment of the effectiveness of the WEAP action plan and community response to drought. This new perspective sheds light on the fact that the District is already achieving the newly prescribed Safe Demand which gives a 95% assurance that Lake Casitas will not drop below 20,000 AF of storage.

However, the report does not adequately acknowledge the need for greater coordination amongst the many agencies and individuals within the Ventura River Watershed. Groundwater provides a large proportion of the local water supply with Lake Casitas as backup, so integrated watershed management should be a priority. The community has shown a remarkable resiliency following the recent drought and fires, and the capacity for increased local water use efficiency should not be underestimated.

Based on the information provided in the Draft CWRP, CMWD has an opportunity to plan for local sustainability rather than develop the costly infrastructure for imported water. As recommended in the report, a full cost/benefit ($/AFY) analysis on a full range of alternatives should be conducted and management options should be prioritized by cost efficiency. The next step should be to develop a comprehensive water use efficiency and conservation policy and program to include:

  1. Integrated water budget for the entire Ventura River Watershed

  2. Coordination with partner agencies and the community

  3. Updated WEAP water allocations to comply with Sustainable Demand

  4. Increased water rates to a level that supports Sustainable Demand

  5. Support for watershed management programs to implement water efficiency and reuse, conservation, and groundwater infiltration and sustainable management


Casitas Water Reports: https://www.casitaswater.org/your-water/casitas-water-security


References:

Ventura River Watershed Management Plan, Walter, Ventura River Watershed Council, March 5, 2015. 

Sustainable Water Use in The Ventura River Watershed, Gardner et al, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, 2013

Climate change and the future of California’s water, Summary of presentation by Dr. Geeta Persad , Mavens Notebook, Nov 7, 2019

The Unaffordable and Destructive Twin Tunnels: Why the Santa Barbara Experience Matters, The California Water Impact Network, November 2017


On this Blog:

Casitas Water


Sunday, April 5, 2020

March rains


March storm moves over the Ojai Valley. This thunderstorm produced a brief period of hail.

After, a record dry January and February, the rains returned in March.  Perhaps not the "March miracle" of the past, but certainly appreciated given the potential for an otherwise very dry year.  At 13" for the season, Ojai is still way below the 23" average rainfall, but it looks like a wet spring ahead.

28 day Rainfall Map, March 2020

The storm of March 11 delivered almost 5 inches at Old Man Mountain, which typically registers the highest rainfall in the region.  Old Man Mountain lies at the headwaters of Matilija Creek, resulting in quickly rising waters during a downpour.  


24 hour rainfall, March 16, 2020
The hydrograph below shows flows in the river for the month of March at Matilija Creek and Foster Park.  The March 16th rain event resulted in peak flows for the season.



Ventura River above Hwy 150,  5pm
March 16, 2020


Ventura River at Santa Ana bridge,  6pm
March 16, 2020

This short burst of energy in the river moved significant amounts of sand and gravel sized sediment downstream.  In addition to visible deposition in Matilija reservoir, sedimentation was evident at Robles diversion and the reach downstream in the Ventura River Preserve.   Gravel is an important habitat consideration for the endangered steelhead, which lay eggs in "redds", or pockets formed in the gravel.  The effects of the Thomas Fire continue to be evident as the river transports sediment eroded from the mountains downstream, to the benefit of riverine habitat. 


Robles Diversion dam, March 19, 2020
Ventura River downstream of Robles Diversion, gravel bars, March 19, 2020
Ventura River Preserve, March 21, 2020


Ventura River Preserve, April 1, 2020

Flows in the river were also translated into rising groundwater at the Ventura River Water District wells and increased storage in Lake Casitas.

Water Supply, Courtesy of Ventura River Water District
April 1, 2020

At time of writing the watershed is preparing for another potentially significant storm and more rainfall for the week of April 5.


On this blog:
Matilija Reservoir March 2020
Steelhead spawning surveys
Thomas Fire


Reference:
Ventura County Rainfall map
Casitas Municipal Water District
Ventura River Water District

Friday, April 27, 2018

Water supply 2018


The ongoing drought has water managers and community members paying much closer attention to our water supply.  Although the signs of unsustainability have been evident for years, the extended drought, and now the impacts of the Thomas Fire, have brought the issue to the forefront of discussions in the watershed.

Aquifer & Reservoir levels, Sept 2017 - courtesy Ventura River Water District


The significance of this downward trend in water supply is evident.  We only received 11" this winter.  And although demand has been reduced by up to 30% in some sectors, it is likely that we will see Stage 5 drought declared this year, which would prohibit outdoor irrigation.

Also significant is that fact that the Ventura River Watershed is independent of imported water, a unique circumstance in Southern California where water imports have fueled unsustainable population growth.  Until now, this independence has been perceived as a benefit.  The primary goal of the Ventura River Watershed Management Plan, published in March 2015, is:

  • Sufficient Local Water Supplies. Sufficient local water supplies to allow continued independence from imported water and reliably support ecosystem and human (including urban and agricultural) needs in the watershed now and in the future, through wise water management.

The watershed plan lists a variety of potential projects, including stormwater capture, conservation, and reuse strategies.  While a few projects have been pursued to date, there is now increased pressure to develop new supply.  And although local agencies all endorsed this plan, the goal of independence has lost priority.



What's the plan?

Local water agencies are working on new supply projects.

The City of Ventura is pursuing a strategy that includes wastewater recycling, ocean desalination, and connection to State Water.  These projects are in the early stages of environmental review, with Notice of Preparation circulated in late 2017 early 2018.

The projects would develop new water supplies to augment the City’s water supply portfolio consistent with the City’s recently completed 2017 Comprehensive Water Resources Report (CWRR) and 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Some of these projects also constitute "Diversion Infrastructure Projects" as that term is defined in the Consent Decree, filed with the U.S. Central California District Court February 3, 2012 between the City, Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper, and Heal the Bay for the protection of the Santa Clara River Estuary.

Central to this strategy is the VenturaWaterPure Project which consists of an Advance Water Purification Facility (AWPF),  product water conveyance pipeline, and proposed groundwater extraction and injection wells. The project also includes construction of a new concentrate discharge pipeline, with an outfall to the ocean.  The Ocean Desalination Project would be sited at the same location as the VenturaWaterPure AWPF.




The project would enable delivery of State Water Project (SWP) water by wheeling water through the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and Calleguas Municipal Water District (Calleguas) water systems to the City of Ventura. The connection would also facilitate direct delivery of SWP water to United Water Conservation District (United) and direct or in-lieu1 delivery of SWP water to Casitas Municipal Water District (Casitas). In addition, the interconnection would allow the City to deliver water to Calleguas during an outage of its imported water supplies. The interconnection would be a pipeline used to transport water between Calleguas’ and the City’s distribution systems.





Casitas Municipal Water District:

Casitas (CMWD) operates Lake Casitas as surface storage which serves as a primary and backup water supply to all users in the watershed.  As illustrated above, the reservoir is approaching all-time low levels.

Casitas is partnering with the City of Ventura on the State Water interconnection as described above.  Other projects under consideration include:

  • Matilija Formation Horizontal Bores (HoBo's)
  • Ojai East Septic Collection, package Treatment, Recharge
  • Pipeline from Matilija Chlorinator to Matilija Hot Springs
  • Renovate Senior canyon Mutual Horizontal Well
  • Ojai Desalter project

CMWD also identified lower priority projects:

  • Scalping Plant for Wastewater Reuse at Ojai Valley Inn
  • Fire Hydrant Flush water Reuse
  • Matilija Dam Groundwater/Surface Water
  • Debris Basin Enhanced Percolation
  • Santa Ana Road Underground Stream
  • Environmental/Habitat Modifications

All of these projects are described more detail in the Preliminary Water Security Analysis, Casitas Municipal Water District, Nov 4, 2016.


Matilija Formation Horizontal Bores, "HoBo's"


Citizen Organizations:

Ojai FLOW: this organization was successful in the effort to gain local control over water supplied to the City of Ojai.  CMWD now operates the infrastructure previously owned by Golden State Water.


Save Our Water Ventura:  Activities of the society and the economy should occur within the limits of the greater environmental system and improve -not weaken - its quality.


Ojai Valley Water Advisory GroupThe purpose of this small 4-person group (Larry Yee, Rosalie Zabilla, Richard Hajas, Peter Thielke) was to analyze the growing water crisis situation in the Ojai Valley brought on by 5 straight years of drought and a seriously low-level Lake Casitas and to explore possible scenarios and solutions. The group released the OVWAG Proposal in February, 2018.   The "Three Sisters" proposal advocates for collaboration between CMWD, Ventura Water, and Calleguas Municipal Water District to increase Ventura County's water supply reliability.






Ventura Water Commission:  A Citizen Advisory Commission to local government:
The Water Commission shall have the power; and it shall be its duty; to review and make advisory recommendations regarding water rates; water resources infrastructure projects in the 5-year capital improvement program; the integrated water resources management plan; water supply options; the Urban Water Management Plan approval process; a water dedication and in-lieu fee requirement; and other water resource issues. 



In the news:

8 debate future of Ojai's water supply, Lake Casitas, Ventura County Star, April 16, 2018

.        Opinion: Integrated water supply

Experts, officials debate water supply in Western Ventura County, VCReporter, 4-18-2018

Why Ojai is moving towards state water in April 2018, Ojai Valley Green Coalition, 5-18-2018

Ventura won't turn wastewater into drinking water just yet, VC Star 7-10-2018

On this blog:  Drought and water supply


Surfrider Foundation position on local water supply - "Surfrider believes that our community can and should learn to live within the natural limits of our surroundings by optimizing the management of our most precious resource: fresh water."



References:





...

Friday, April 13, 2018

March Rains - fires, flood, drought, and sand

Matilija Dam, March 22, 2018

They aren't calling it a "March miracle," but to many of us it felt like it.  A fairly steady wet period delivered around 8" of rain to the Ojai Valley, and rescued this year from the record books.  Seasonal totals range from 6" in Ventura, to over 11" in Ojai, with Matilija Canyon receiving over 16". This is just a bit less than half the "average" rainfall for our watershed. 

Water supply, April 1 2018   (from Ventura River Water District) 


The Ventura River Water District monitors levels in the Upper Ventura River Groundwater basin as well as Lake Casitas.   Note that the groundwater (blue line) responds quickly to rainfall compared to the large volume of the reservoir.  This graph shows the general downward trend in water storage, which unfortunately was not helped much with this season's rainfall.  

Water managers are also concerned that the Thomas Fire is impacting supply.  Huge volumes of ash and silt eroded from the burned landscape and deposited within the riverbed, possibly hindering infiltration into the underground aquifer.    So far this year the blue line shows a  relatively small uptick compared with past seasons.   

The March rains did mobilize a bit more ash, but more noticeably the river has again remained turbid (brown) for an extended period due to high levels of silt eroding from the bare mountainsides.

Flows remain high and silty in the Ventura River Preserve, March 30, 2018



This hydrograph for the month of March (thru April 13) shows flows at Foster Park (green line...8500) and below Matilija Dam (red line...4495).  The graph clearly shows storm peaks throughout the month, with the final storm registering around 4000 cfs.   This plot also confirms observations that river flows have remained relatively high following the final storm.  This may indicate significant changes in the hydrology of the watershed due to the Thomas Fire.  On the other hand, USGS data show that flows are now comparable with the historic median. The Upper Ventura River Groundwater Sustainability Agency (UVRGSA) recently commissioned studies to monitor and assess the situation.  

Flows at Foster Park, Spring 2018



Ventura Rivermouth, March 28, 2018

Finally, this aerial view of the rivermouth also shows silty water flowing into the ocean at Surfers' Point.   Not surprisingly,  Surfrider Ventura's new Blue Water Task Force and County testing found poor ocean water quality following the rains.  But look at that sand!

The gun turrets are now buried with sand, showing how the delta has grown compared with Ventura river mouth after the 2017 flood.  With fire and flood, a flowing river and eroding hillsides make for wider beaches...